Taxes . . . In the Eye or Pocket of the Beholder

Low Budget Sign High Budget Sign (sort of)
I got an email from Joe Sutton just this last week on the issue of the Sno-Isle Library, as I am sure many of you did. If not read on.
From: Joe Sutton
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 9:54 AM
To: Joe Sutton
Subject: Library ballot titles are here … and missing some important information
** PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW THAT LIVES IN THE LAKE STEVENS SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND ESPECIALLY TO CITY RESIDENTS **
Hello Friends and Neighbors,
Library ballots are here and I wanted to touch bases with everyone to make sure you are aware of an important fact – the ballot title is missing some important information. Here is the ballot title:
“Shall the City of Lake Stevens be annexed to and be a part of the Sno-Isle Intercounty Rural Library District?”
Nowhere is there any mention or indication of the significant NEW property tax that will be assessed if this annexation is approved by voters. I don’t know how the city can get away with this or if it is even legal, but I believe it is dishonest at best for them to leave this information off the ballot.
Be aware that if this is approved, you will have the exact library you have today (the small structure in downtown), but you will have additional, new property taxes as follows:
Home value New property tax
$200K =$63
$300K =$94
$400K =$125
$500K =$157
$600K =$187
$700K =$219
$800K =$250
(add $31.30 for each additional $100K of assessed value)
Also be aware that YOU ALREADY PAY PROPERTY TAXES TO THE CITY WHICH ARE USED FOR THE LIBRARY. This vote will establish a NEW TAX paid to Sno-Isle for the operating the current library. The city is KEEPING YOUR EXISTING LIBRARY TAXES AND SPENDING THEM ELSEWHERE. This is about $500,000 in taxes for all city residents for library operations.
Also, the city and Sno-Isle will ask all citizens within the School district boundaries for ANOTHER TAX INCREASE NEXT YEAR to build a huge/new library as part of the new civic center project they are planning. Based on recent new libraries in Snohomish and Arlington, each of you could be paying hundreds of additional property tax dollars for that building.
Library cards sure are getting expensive these days.
ANOTHER IMPORTANT POINT: If the citizens say ‘NO’ to the annexation and the new library tax, the LIBRARY WILL NOT CLOSE. City officials will need to keep to their responsibility of managing the city budget in such a way to pay for the items that are a PRIORTY. Each of us must manage our family budget carefully each month, so it is very reasonable to expect the city to continue to do the same. If they need additional taxes for ‘new’ spending, then I am sure you agree they should ask us in a separate vote if we are willing to fund those with new taxes.
Please forward this email to anyone you know that lives in the Lake Stevens school district. If you live outside the city limits, this will affect you next year because you will be also be asked to help pay for the new library building.
Thanks for paying attention and don’t forget to fill out your ballot and mail it back in by May 20. If you need a stamp, I will gladly provide one free of charge! If you don’t vote, you can’t complain! (and that is the half the fun)
Best wishes,
Joe Sutton
P.S. Please enjoy the email I sent to the city council and the mayor below.
From: Joe Sutton
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 8:58 AM
To: hcoleman@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,ndooley@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,squigley@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,
kholder@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,thartwell@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,little@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,janb@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,
jspencer@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us,msomers@ci.lake-stevens.wa.us
Cc: Mary Kelly
Subject: Library ballot title is incompleteDear members of the Lake Stevens city government,
I received my ballot today for voting on the library annexation to Sno-Isle and all I see is the following:
“Shall the City of Lake Stevens be annexed to and be a part of the Sno-Isle Intercounty Rural Library District?”
Nowhere is there any mention or indication of the significant NEW property tax that will be assessed if this move is approved by voters. I don’t know how you can get away with this or if it is even legal, but I believe it is dishonest at best to leave this information off the ballot.
I believe this omission was intentional and part of a carefully crafted plan by the city and Sno-Isle to sneak a tax increase past un-informed voters. As a voter, the ballot title SOUNDS like an OK idea until you understand the facts that:
1) We already pay a library tax as part of our city property tax – the city is keeping those taxes (a stealth tax increase)
2) Our high property taxes will go even higher with our ‘double’ library tax, but we don’t get any new or improved library services – we get exactly the same for a whole lot more money (we will be asked to pay more taxes in the future for a new building).I am sure you understood that a large number of voters would not be able to attend the public meetings to discuss this item and that many of them would not get the needed information from newspapers, etc. I am sure you crafted the ballot title without the mention of the new tax understanding that many voters would say ‘yes’ who otherwise would not if the information on the new tax was clearly described.
It is no wonder that voters/citizens are skeptical of and do not trust our civic officials at times. This whole ‘new library tax’ scenario and vote is a prime example of why they do not.
Once again I implore you to ‘do the right thing’: If this ballot measure passes, immediately reduce the city property tax by the exact amount of the library spending that is moving ‘off budget’. Give citizens their money back … it is their money - originally provided to you for library services.
If you need additional ‘revenue’ for a civic center, parks, staffing, sidewalks or anything else, and if new taxes are needed, then bring that need to the citizens of the city and let them help decide if they are important enough to raise their taxes. Put these new spending items to a VOTE OF THE PEOPLE (with clear, complete ballot titles). Property taxes are extremely high and new taxes should be decided by a ballot - not in a small, sparsely attended public meetings which very few citizens can practically attend.
In doing so, you will regain the trust and respect of many citizen voters by giving them a choice and a voice.
Thank you for taking the time to read my thoughts,
An overtaxed and very concerned city property owner,
Joe Sutton
10724 Vernon Road

